Jim Wackett - 17 November 2008 10:29 AM
The experience we are offering blokes at ‘church’ is very different to the one we offer at these great blokes ‘events’.
That is absolutely true and I don’t think many people realise it. Church *is* an experience - encouraging people to get involved in making that experience happen might be helpful for a few, but the majority of men in a church service are still going to be pew sitters.
Getting people involved in stuff that happens outside of church just makes church a more socially enjoyable experience, in that you might have met a few people before.
The quoted person who found it too hard to get to church with his family etc is just doing the sums - what it costs to get to and from church isn’t worth the effort for what he gets out of it. That says a lot. Now if he was introduced to other people at social events, it may make it worth the effort from a social perspective, but that’s still tangential to the actual church experience.
Church is, for the most part, singing songs and being preached at. To me, it’s a wonder that any/many guys go as often as they do.
Seriously, who (in the secular world) sings? Who listens to some guy talk about stuff that may not be particularly relevant or easily understood (there’s often so much assumed knowledge), or isn’t even missed if he doesn’t go? If you know you don’t miss it, why would you return?